Fedora 18 and network

[Reindl Harald]

Am 21.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Tim:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 22:38 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> and nobody needs NM for workstations with static IP's
> 
> Yes, and no.  Yes, you don't need it.  But it can still be useful.
> 
> Apart from the most obvious - static addresses being configured by your
> central DHCP server, rather than each machine requiring individual
> configuration. 

and for that do i need NM?
why?

[root at srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat ifcfg-eth1
DEVICE=eth1
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
IPV6INIT=no
NM_CONTROLLED=no
USERCTL=no

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130221/f58f6934/attachment.sig>