Proposal: Fedora should install with IPv6 disabled by default [was: Re: Disabling ipv6]

Fernando Lozano fernando at lozano.eti.br
Fri Jul 12 15:49:40 UTC 2013


Hi Chris,

[As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the 
kernel. Just the network interfaces configs that should come with IPv6 
disabled by default, if the user wants it should be easy to enable]

> Once upon a time, Fernando Lozano <fernando at lozano.eti.br> said:
>> IPv6 has alot of "under the carpet" issues because vendors fear too
>> much discussion about this will delay large-scale use even more.
> Again: citation needed.  Without any actual issues sited, you are just
> spreading FUD.
Works both ways. You can't claim I'm just spreading FUD withou evidence 
to corroborate your claim.

Anyway I've alread sent to the list evidence that the IPv6 security 
issues are real. As for "vendors fear too much discussion" it's really 
my personal interpretation of their silence, fell free to disagree. But 
please don't deny anymore there are IPv6 security issues, this is a hard 
fact.

>> I propose we let the billion dollars companies do the hard work, but
>> at the same protect SMBs from IPv6. The Fedora Project could do
>> their part by disabling IPv6 by default.
> Again, you are years too late.  Fedora would be greatly regressing (and
> falling far behind mainstream OSes) by disabling IPv6.
Fedora should take the lead and be more responsible to their users. It 
would be an improvement, not a regression.

>> Please see my message providing links about IPv6 security threats,
>> including recent slides (this year!) from IETF members. I do my
>> homework before making statements on the net.
> I took a look at a couple, but just saw more FUD and stopped.
Fell free to ignore reallity when it doesn't agree with your personal 
opinion. But be warned reallity will hurt you anyway.

Or will you tell me that IETF people don't know what they are talking 
about? See for example:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-03
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-05

Papers from them, and even very recent RFCs on the security issues, can 
be foud if you take the time to follow my links and the links contained 
in them.


[]s, Fernando Lozano



More information about the users mailing list