/usr/local/lib*

[Reindl Harald]

Am 22.07.2013 14:31, schrieb lee:
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> writes:
>> because the FHS says it and after UsrMove anything
>> in /lib was merged to /usr/lib
>>
>> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root   root    7 2013-05-30 23:36 bin -> usr/bin
>> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root   root    7 2013-05-30 23:36 lib -> usr/lib
>> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root   root    9 2013-05-30 23:36 lib64 -> usr/lib64
>> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root   root    8 2013-05-30 23:36 sbin -> usr/sbin
> 
> That was a very bad idea:
> 
> "/bin contains commands that may be used by both the system
> administrator and by users, but which are required when no other
> filesystems are mounted"[1]

lsinitrd | grep usr/bin
lsinitrd | grep usr/sbin

> The /usr file system is usually on its own partition.  Implicitly
> creating a requirement to have it on the same partition as the root fs
> is bad, and /bin should not be under /usr.  It violates the FHS, see
> [2]: /usr/bin should hold "most user commands", and considering [1],
> that excludes commands "which are required when no other filesystems are
> mounted" unless you want dupes.
> 
> [1]: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#BINESSENTIALUSERCOMMANDBINARIES
> [2]: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEUSRHIERARCHY

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130722/9de8f824/attachment-0001.sig>