How does one get a clean installation of Fedora?
Reindl Harald
h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Jul 29 16:25:17 UTC 2013
Am 29.07.2013 18:14, schrieb lee:
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> writes:
>
>> Am 28.07.2013 23:53, schrieb lee:
>>> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> writes:
>>>>> Needed by whome?
>>>>
>>>> by the user?
>>>>
>>>> [harry at srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l
>>>> 1334
>>>>
>>>> with my meta-package below i can kill *anything*
>>>> what "package-cleanup --leaves --all" shows
>>>
>>> What is the effect of this package? Making sure that the packages you
>>> commonly need get installed?
>>
>> that *anything* i am using is installed
>
> That doesn't have much to do with getting rid of what isn't needed.
surely
look how long is your list of "package-cleanup --leaves --all"
and how long is mine, i can uninstall anything which is
listed there because the metapackage requires things i
have installed and use
[root at rh:~]$ package-cleanup --leaves --all
Geladene Plugins: etckeeper, presto, protectbase
[root at rh:~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l
1334
>>> That still wouldn't allow me to get rid of unneeded packages, would it?
>>
>> *your* viewpoint of "needed" is not the same as the viewpoint
>> of binaries - here you start:
>
> Which of the binaries that would be removed if I removed the avahi
> package needs avahi-daemon? VLC, for example, definitely doesn't
discuss this with the rpmfusion maintainer
with the current dependencies *it does*
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130729/8588cd69/attachment.sig>
More information about the users
mailing list