F18 *vs.* yum update??
Reindl Harald
h.reindl at thelounge.net
Wed Jun 5 18:14:36 UTC 2013
Am 05.06.2013 20:08, schrieb Beartooth:
> On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 22:17:18 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Looks like you've somehow installed a f18 kernel on a genuine f17 box.
>
> That could be :
>
> [btth at Hbsk2 ~]$ cat /etc/fedora-release
> Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle)
this is clearly a F17 and most likely someone enabled
the rawhide repo to clutter the setup
> Yum update --skip-broken got me a disiplay of lines rushing up
> the screen too fast to read, which literally went on for several minutes.
> It ended up with :
>
> Transaction Summary
> ================================================================================================
> Install 3 Packages (+7 Dependent packages)
> Upgrade 71 Packages
> Remove 2 Packages
> Skipped (dependency problems) 2688 Packages
>
> Total download size: 293 M
> Is this ok [y/N]:
>
> I assented, noting that most but not all of the lines above
> contained an fc18 term. This time I got :
>
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
*wow* do *not* skip-broken in case of *dist-upgrades*
this is the way to go in doubt and *not* "yum update"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_17_-.3E_Fedora_18
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130605/126283e1/attachment.sig>
More information about the users
mailing list