F18 - systemd question

Ed Greshko Ed.Greshko at greshko.com
Wed Mar 6 09:31:45 UTC 2013


On 03/06/13 17:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 06.03.2013 10:03, schrieb Ed Greshko:
>> On 03/06/13 16:52, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>
>>>> So you feel the -u parameter (access time) isn't sufficient to keep from
>>>> deleting directories in use?
>>> If the service did not access the private tmp directory in X day, yes.
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801943
>>>
>> I see nothing in that bugzilla which states that a service has failed due to a directory in /var/tmp/systemd-private-* being deleted by the cron job while the file/directory was in use. 
> and THAT it what happens!
>
> if nothing is using the PrivateTmp which reflects /tmp
> for the service all is fine and you would not need it
> at all, if the service is using it you are f**ed

Shouldn't the -umc flag of tmpwatch prevent directories in use from being deleted?

If you know of a service which doesn't access its related /var/tmp/systemd-private-* in 30 days and then subsequently fails when deleted by the tmpwatch cron job then please bugzilla it.





-- 
From now on, at least during winter time, Im going to blame all spelling an grammar erros on the cat sitting on my chest every time I sit down at the computer....

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130306/352e95d8/attachment.sig>


More information about the users mailing list