error: Failed dependencies: but libraries are installed

Richard Shaw hobbes1069 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 3 18:20:49 UTC 2013


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:55 AM, myken <myken at iae.nl> wrote:

>  On 03/09/13 18:44, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:23 AM, myken <myken at iae.nl> wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/13 18:15, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> I can't tell any problems based on this output... Try getting the raw
>>> requires and see if something sticks out:
>>>
>>> rpm -qp --requires diamond_2_2-base_x64-101-x86_64-linux.rpm
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>  How do I know if something sticks out?
>>
>> I run the command and I got a long list of libraries including:
>> libXi.so.6
>> libXi.so.6()(64bit)
>>
>> Do you require the complete list?
>
>
>  Wouldn't hurt... I looked at downloading the package but chrome didn't
> seem to like the page where I presume you have to accept some sort of
> agreement...
>
>  You can make sure the requirements are being met using repoquery...
> Something like:
>  $  repoquery --whatprovides "libXi.so.6()(64bit)"
> libXi-0:1.6.1-2.fc18.x86_64
>  libXi-0:1.6.2.901-1.fc18.x86_64
>
>
>  Richard
>
>
> To download the package you need to register at Lattice. If I remember
> correctly only a name and email is required.
>
> The result of repoquery --whatprovides "libXi.so.6()(64bit)" is on my
> system:
> libXi-0:1.6.2.901-1.fc18.x86_64
> libXi-0:1.6.1-2.fc18.x86_64
>
> The result of rpm -qp --requires diamond_2_2-base_x64-101-x86_64-linux.rpm
> is:
> /bin/bash
> /bin/csh
> /bin/ksh
> /bin/sh
> /bin/sh
> /bin/sh
> /usr/bin/env
> ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
> ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> ld-linux.so.2
> ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_2.1)
> libICE.so.6
> libICE.so.6()(64bit)
> libQtCLucene.so.4
> libQtCLucene.so.4()(64bit)
>
[SNIP]

Once oddity is that it seems to, in many cases, require the library names
both with and without the "()(64bit)"... Although I'm not sure if that's
causing any of the problems...

Sorry I couldn't be more help.

Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130903/e052c9ca/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list