Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

poma pomidorabelisima at gmail.com
Fri Jan 17 20:03:39 UTC 2014


On 17.01.2014 20:44, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:39:00PM +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 17.01.2014 20:18, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote:
>>>> On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> To X2Go or not to X2Go!?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a problem in x2go, I
>>>>> installed it fine a few weeks ago. There have been several reports of
>>>>> failed scriplets among various packages.
>>>>
>>>> I see scriptlets breakdown only with those packages.
>>>> Bummer!
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054932
>>>
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/445554.html
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/445555.html
>>>
>>> After applying the above fix, reinstall the packages with scriptlet
>>> failures.
> 
> Please read the second message carefully; did you set selinux to
> permissive before applying the update?
> 
> # setenforce 0
> # <update selinux>
> # setenforce 1

I think I don't remember that I ever had to do it.
This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux.
If I'm not mistaken it seems as if the dog bites its own tail! :)
Not you, I mean the SELinux.


poma




More information about the users mailing list