serious scriptlet problems with today's updates

[Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.]

On 01/17/2014 11:46 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 1/17/2014 10:55 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mark Haney <mhaney at practichem.com>
>> wrote:
>>> My question is, WTF happened?  My system is pretty clean. I
>>> never install packages by hand, only by either the standard
>>> Fedora repos or RPMFusion.  These were all Fedora repo updates,
>>> FWIW.  Did anyone else see this?
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/445554.html
>>
>>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/445555.html
> Geez.  NEITHER of the two replies I received were useful in any
> meaningful way.  That's just lazy, people.  If it hadn't been for
> Ian's just posted message, I'd still not know WTF was going on.  And
> I'm seriously concerned about how an SELinux policy was released
> stable with this big a problem attached to it.
>
>
>
> - -- 
> Mark Haney
> Network Administrator/IT Support
> Practichem
> W:919-714-8428
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS2V5iAAoJEDgEuzPE0JQveIQIAOAZlSSpYrOVm6/xzZn0Y4NR
> zTHHj/Y2+0crzTLpqjg80IEDretliA5yE83cFSYi93tZbAZLbIt6xbhWZkIMJaCR
> /YGBVPOhzG+N0J4ez9F8qHUVFqF6MqzaOQdj9cmX6ZnxehKKtRyl1yMQadnRtiLm
> MHElEK1SLF88L9bOY+iRgzY6MZr1KVp4HZHDQeC5MPkF0pKh8yD8qfjHHpIzmhAO
> lxZ6Pcd+R00zuFkp069NkdyXfius18IHnW6aZWg8zzTeHtc9lkVV83eLSziy8434
> hNfRkFGby6ozp9oWiedcT9KlZxVaa3ygXG6v4MFnxgw2+leV+jo7fji7D3C8+K4=
> =SH0Y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
I'm just glad they're aware of it! I just upgraded my friend from F-19 
to F-20......it went without a hitch....but I have yet to do the usual 
process of updating it....so hopefully by the time I do get to 
it...(sometime Tuesday evening!) it will go also without a hitch!


EGO II