Network availability systemd dependency failure at boot

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Sat Jul 5 23:32:11 UTC 2014


On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:30:06 -0400
Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com> wrote:

> R. G. Newbury writes:
> 
> >>
> >> That at least works up to the day systemd decides
> >> no one needs rc.local and they drop support for
> >> it (a day that is sure to come :-).
> >
> > Direct support for rc.local has already been "deprecated".
> > Somewhere I read something from Lennart and it was clear that he
> > has an almost religious hatred for doing things 'the old way', so
> > much so that rc.local is not 'desired'.
> 
> I got the same impression. If it worked, reliably, for decades, it's
> not desired any more.

I'd love a cite if you can find one... I don't know of any reason it
would ever be removed. It doesn't run or do anything if you don't have
an rc.local file. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140705/5a4feda5/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the users mailing list