Network availability systemd dependency failure at boot
Sam Varshavchik
mrsam at courier-mta.com
Sun Jul 6 01:17:17 UTC 2014
Ed Greshko writes:
> >
> > Hilarity ensues.
>
> Any plans to bugzilla your issue? It should be fun to follow.
Well, I thought about this. For about 30 seconds.
I'm going to say something controversial now. It'll likely send some flames
my way; and my ethics will get questioned. Maybe, I suppose, someday I'll
care about that, but not today.
This is the very last thing that I'd like to do. Rather, I want systemd to
fail. To go down, hard, rather than get some help in band-aiding its fall-
out.
I'd like to see Red Hat start getting tickets from angry, paying customers,
who, after upgrading to RHEL 7, end up half their servers come up deaf and
mute. And a different subset of servers having a problem with every boot
cycle.
I'm tired of dealing, first with the PrivateTmp fiasco, and now this, and
who knows what's next. Hopefully, at least someone might understand why
someone else will NOT want to help fixing this mess, but, if not, that's ok
too.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140705/bd7c78a1/attachment.sig>
More information about the users
mailing list