why do we use systemd?

[poma]

On 07/05/2014 08:23 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> On Saturday, July 05, 2014 12:12:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> Additionally, since about f17, '.service' is assumed...
>>
>> ie,
>>
>> systemctl status foobar
>>
>> is the same as
>>
>> sysemctl status foobar.service
>
> Again, many thanks - tested and verified.
>
> Now the only thing I can moan about is the lack of
>    chkconfig --list
>

Due to its complexity, do not expect too short directives like that.
Instead utilize aliases, see Adrian's notes.
By the way, what is 'chkconfig', anyway.


poma