Network availability systemd dependency failure at boot - U.B.E.R. L.A.M.E.

[poma]

On 07/06/2014 03:17 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Ed Greshko writes:
>
>>>
>>> Hilarity ensues.
>>
>> Any plans to bugzilla your issue?  It should be fun to follow.
>
> Well, I thought about this. For about 30 seconds.
>
> I'm going to say something controversial now. It'll likely send some flames
> my way; and my ethics will get questioned. Maybe, I suppose, someday I'll
> care about that, but not today.
>
> This is the very last thing that I'd like to do. Rather, I want systemd to
> fail. To go down, hard, rather than get some help in band-aiding its fall-
> out.
>
> I'd like to see Red Hat start getting tickets from angry, paying customers,
> who, after upgrading to RHEL 7, end up half their servers come up deaf and
> mute. And a different subset of servers having a problem with every boot
> cycle.
>
> I'm tired of dealing, first with the PrivateTmp fiasco, and now this, and
> who knows what's next. Hopefully, at least someone might understand why
> someone else will NOT want to help fixing this mess, but, if not, that's ok
> too.
>

It is not at all controversial, it is U.B.E.R. L.A.M.E. from you!
You like a true opportunist expect someone else to solve your specific problem.


poma