why do we use systemd?

[David Benfell]

lee writes:
>
> I don't mind this idea.  Yet when I disable something, I expect it to be
> disabled.

This is another terminology issue, which I think should be viewed  
separately from the merits/demerits of systemd itself. And I'm inclined to  
agree that the terms are poorly chosen.

I guess the concept of 'mask' is as in to disguise, as in to hide. For me,  
that's two steps of abstraction and I don't normally infer the second from  
the first. So it throws me too.

-- 
David Benfell
See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you do not understand the  
attachment.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140708/2062665c/attachment.sig>