Why do we use systemd

[lee]

"R. G. Newbury" <newbury at mandamus.org> writes:

> So 'masked' is actually NEVER NOT EVEN WHEN YOU WANT IT. and DISABLED
> means SOMETIMES,

They confuse "masked" with "disabled" and "disabled" with "ondemand" and
deny to fix that.

> This thread contains numerous instances of why systemd is not well
> architected, although what it does do, it seems to do well.

There was also someone reporting that it doesn't do what it's supposed
to.  That seemed to be because it's so complicated that even the makers
of the distribution didn't manage to set it up correctly.

Systemd is one more thing designed to take the control of our computers
away from us.  Think of it:  All major distributions have no choice but
to use it, it takes over all kinds of things and intentionally confuses
developers and users alike through means that were already pointed out.
And interestingly, ppl are trying to explain how systemd is not bad
while nobody explains why it is good.


-- 
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)