DNF vs. YUM

[Mark Haney]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've been using DNF pretty regularly since upgrading to F20 and so far
I'm not sure I see any real big difference between them.  Although, I
may not be supposed to see a difference.

The one thing I have noticed is that DNF quite often shows no updates
available and YUM does.  For instance today, on two F20 systems (one
at home and the other the system I'm on now) dnf update said there
were no updates but yum had 20+ on both.

I'm curious, why is there such a big discrepancy?  Aren't they both
using the same repositories?  Is it an architectural change that
causes that?  I know it's still in testing mode, but I would think the
output would be nearly the same.

What gives?

- -- 
Mark Haney
Network/Systems Administrator
Practichem
W: (919) 714-8428
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) 3.13.4-200.fc20.x86_64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTIa6dAAoJEM/YzwEAv6e7ghQH/0sK3vqrXwQ3q+hRAHBkDESH
MhC8UtOfXXamWCVVLIq76t49Zae4hkRh8+BRXvBlRoqayZ8VzO0fGwsCaOGglBJW
k6tsywafQwISvoveeeosXjRWKSI/POpWORbUmrbY0LaJ3En7HgD8dMW5RLBKgpIR
ygMLdYUSmvsx5/NX6aBFOBjIglDXWY7nqriAD4dkF3EMlUbgnh1frF5FaxB7266j
NZeVLVdXf5aQDRBCItCyv6tKSja88+PvX0k0gc3FC73dDHTPEcuhmapG5nl6ki2c
Zzw9lJhNs5KPkq6x4cfqJ+/x/MDS42NOQBScvousYWOAJCNLW7eTXJHULzVLfqg=
=7Iae
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----