DNF vs. YUM

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:12:04 -0400
Mark Haney <mhaney at practichem.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I've been using DNF pretty regularly since upgrading to F20 and so far
> I'm not sure I see any real big difference between them.  Although, I
> may not be supposed to see a difference.
> 
> The one thing I have noticed is that DNF quite often shows no updates
> available and YUM does.  For instance today, on two F20 systems (one
> at home and the other the system I'm on now) dnf update said there
> were no updates but yum had 20+ on both.
> 
> I'm curious, why is there such a big discrepancy?  Aren't they both
> using the same repositories?  Is it an architectural change that
> causes that?  I know it's still in testing mode, but I would think the
> output would be nearly the same.
> 
> What gives?

http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/user_faq.html#why-do-i-get-different-results-with-dnf-update-vs-yum-update

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140313/1cd00d5b/attachment.sig>