DNF vs. YUM

[Paul Cartwright]

On 03/13/2014 10:17 AM, Kevin Martin wrote:
> I'm with you Mark...CLi all the way with the updates.  And I like what DNF does with skipping repos it can't find.  BTW, if you set
> "metadata_expire=-1" in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf then the metadata *always downloads from the repo.   One thing I don't get is why I see
> these errors from time to time (like this morning):
+1 for Mark also..

I just looked in /var/log and notice that there is a dnf.log , yet I
only use yum . tailing dnf.log shows this:
Mar 13 10:11:15 DEBUG repo: using cache for: rpmfusion-free
Mar 13 10:11:15 DEBUG not found deltainfo for: RPM Fusion for Fedora 20
- Free
Mar 13 10:11:15 DEBUG repo: using cache for: updates
Mar 13 10:11:15 DEBUG repo: using cache for: google-chrome
Mar 13 10:11:15 DEBUG not found deltainfo for: google-chrome
Mar 13 10:11:15 DEBUG repo: using cache for: rpmfusion-nonfree
Mar 13 10:11:15 DEBUG not found deltainfo for: RPM Fusion for Fedora 20
- Nonfree
Mar 13 10:11:15 DEBUG hawkey sack setup time: 0.846
Mar 13 10:11:15 INFO Metadata cache created.


I don't remember installing or using DNF, and there is also a yum.log ,
so...

-- 
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587