fedup failure [SOLVED]

[Ahmad Samir]

On 24 March 2014 11:13, John Pilkington <J.Pilk at tesco.net> wrote:

> On 24/03/14 07:20, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>
>
>> The other link I posted[1] is about the gpgkey entry in fedora .repo
>> files in /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo; IIUC at some point it was changed to be:
>> gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch
>>
>> note the $releasever bit there; the error message you posted mentioned:
>> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-x86_64
>>
>
> I got confused by this. I have three .rpmnew files in repo.d, for
> fedora-updates-testing, for rpmfusion-free-updates-testing, and for
> rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.  I reinstalled them yesterday, and the
> fedora version has -$basearch, the rpmfusion ones don't.
>
>
I was mainly talking about the fedora* repos. I looked at the rpmfusion
ones on my box and indeed they don't have the $basearch bit at the end;
that's how rpmfusion package their .repo files, so it's not a bug per se.


> That's what I see for the updates versions, too.  F19.
>
> I had edited the original versions to enable the repos I use.
>
> John P
>
>  Ahmad Samir
>>
>>
>>
> --
> users mailing list
> users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
Ahmad Samir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140324/5065f7b3/attachment.html>