what does this error message mean?

[poma]

On 15.10.2014 18:08, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:46:57 +0200 poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 15.10.2014 17:11, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:49:16 +0200 poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 15.10.2014 14:48, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:28:53 +0200 poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15.10.2014 07:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:40:50 +0200 poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 15.10.2014 05:35, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have the following messages upon boot/wakeup from hibernate (in my dmesg also):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ......
>>>>>>>>> [    9.049204] systemd[1]: Received SIGRTMIN+21 from PID 313 (plymouthd).
>>>>>>>>> [    9.076954] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3
>>>>>>>>> [    9.076955] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast
>>>>>>>>> [    9.076963] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
>>>>>>>>> [    9.250563] iwlwifi 0000:06:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
>>>>>>>>> [    9.253393] iwlwifi 0000:06:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
>>>>>>>>> [    9.267833] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlp6s0: link is not ready
>>>>>>>>> [    9.402844] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6
>>>>>>>>> [    9.402847] tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk at qualcomm.com>
>>>>>>>>> [   14.782008] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20140724/nsarguments-95)
>>>>>>>>> [   14.782106] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP: failed to evaluate _DSM
>>>>>>>>> [   14.782110] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20140724/nsarguments-95)
>>>>>>>>> [   18.485668] traps: pnmixer[1226] trap int3 ip:34d10504e9 sp:7fffae324c50 error:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What does it mean? Is there a bug? If so, what should I file against?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> pnmixer does not come up, but it does come up when I type it afterwards.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Ranjan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.memtest.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, cryptic poma, what am I supposed to do with this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have memtest setup and have done it from boot: got the message "Pass: Press ESC to exit" or something like that. So what do I do now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pray enlighten me!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ranjan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here, 5 passes without error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your result?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have 8 passes without error. Says "Pass complete. No error detected: Press ESC to exit" (I am relaying this message from memory -- the wording may be a bit different, but not very.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, where is the rest of the message, after "...traps: pnmixer ... error:"?
>>>
>>> Michael also asked this question, and there was nothing after that then! That is where the messages ended. (This was upon a boot last night). And I hibernated after that, but it did not come back up (rather came back up with a non-working mouse -- clicks that would not do anything), so I had to reboot.
>>>
>>> Here is the dmesg output (now):
>>>
>>> $ dmesg | fpaste
>>> Uploading (91.9KiB)...
>>> http://ur1.ca/idldg -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/142121/38568514
>>>
>>> And here are lsmod:
>>>
>>> $ lsmod | fpaste
>>> Uploading (5.3KiB)...
>>> http://ur1.ca/idlde -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/142120/13385650
>>> maitra at bhagirathi 10:07:35~$ 
>>>
>>> and 
>>>
>>> $ lspci -v | fpaste
>>> Uploading (8.6KiB)...
>>> http://ur1.ca/idldm -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/142123/85718141
>>>
>>> I have had a very good run with Fedora (from circa 2003, the days of FC1) but this is the first time I am unable to get a machine working to my satisfaction. (And it is not at all clear to me that the distribution has much to do with it. These may be kernel issues, and I have submitted to bugzilla both on Fedora and kernel.org but so far no resolution/workaround.) This is a Dell Precision M3800.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Have you tried with this one?
>> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/x86_64/
> 
> I have been trying this now: 
> 
> kernel-3.17.0-1.vanilla.mainline.knurd.1.fc20.x86_64
> 
> so that it helps in debugging for kernel.org. I was thinking of trying 3.17.1 when it is released. From what I understood, the kernel with kernel.x86_64 3.18.0-0.rc0.git6.1.fc22  may well be the same. Prior to that, I tried:
> 
> kernel-3.17.0-0.rc7.git3.1.fc22.x86_64
> kernel-3.17.0-0.rc7.git2.1.fc22.x86_64
> 
> from rawhide. 
> 

:)

kernel-3.18.0-0.rc0.git8.1.fc22
Completed	Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:32:36 UTC
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=585364

kernel-3.17.0-0.rc7.git3.1.fc22
Completed	Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:19:07 UTC
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=582519

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log

While you said the same, it has already passed.