A Linux for the totally maintenance free

[Ian Malone]

On 23 October 2014 22:40, Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 12:40 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
>>
>> but there are (some) 686 libs for those common 32-bit apps that need 'em.
>> Look at "yum list available | less" then search for "[356]86".
>
>
> There is a barebones set of 32-bit binary libraries. No development
> packages. Calling this an environment is dubious. Installing RHEL and
> expecting any 32-bit app to run will leave you disappointed.
>

Can someone point me to where the set of libraries is listed or
described to be 'barebones', otherwise it sounds like the same
situation for running a 64 bit RHEL 6 or Fedora and using 32bit apps,
which I already do in quite a lot of cases. (This is not rhetorical
sarcasm, I really would like to know for exactly that reason.)

-- 
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk