Driver for RTL8192su chipset

Ed Greshko ed.greshko at greshko.com
Mon Oct 27 02:43:42 UTC 2014


On 10/27/14 10:15, poma wrote:
> On 27.10.2014 02:24, jd1008 wrote:
>> On 10/26/2014 05:38 PM, poma wrote:
>>> - station(client) mode
>>> $ modinfo r8712u
>>> filename:       /lib/modules/3.17.1-202.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/staging/rtl8712/r8712u.ko.xz
>>> firmware:       rtlwifi/rtl8712u.bin
>>> author:         Larry Finger
>>> description:    rtl871x wireless lan driver
>>> license:        GPL
>>>
>>> - master(AP) mode
>>> $ modinfo rtl8192su
>>> filename:       /lib/modules/3.17.1-202.fc20.x86_64/updates/rtl8192su.ko
>>> firmware:       rtlwifi/rtl8192sufw.bin
>>> description:    Realtek 8188S/8191S/8192S 802.11n USB wireless
>>> license:        GPL
>>> author:         Christian Lamparter	<chunkeey at googlemail.com>
>>> author:         Joshua Roys		<Joshua.Roys at gtri.gatech.edu>
>>> author:         Larry Finger		<Larry.Finger at lwfinger.net>
>>> author:         Realtek WlanFAE		<wlanfae at realtek.com>
>>> author:         lizhaoming		<chaoming_li at realsil.com.cn>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/rtl819x
>>> https://wiki.debian.org/rtl819x
>>>
>>>
>>> poma
>> must I manually install kernel 17?  It is not yet in the updates repo:
>>
>> # yum update
>> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
>> adobe-linux-x86_64 |  951 B  00:00:00
>> google-earth |  951 B  00:00:00
>> rpmfusion-free-updates | 3.3 kB  00:00:00
>> rpmfusion-nonfree-updates | 3.3 kB  00:00:00
>> updates/20/x86_64/metalink |  19 kB  00:00:00
>> No packages marked for update
>>
> Forget the kernel version, it doesn't matter, I'm just showing what I currently drive.
> The question is do you need a:
> 1. Station mode
> or
> 2. Access Point  mode
> or
> 3. Both
>
> See http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/modes
>
> BTW paste here 'lsusb' output

The location of the driver.... 

/lib/modules/3.17.1-202.fc20.x86_64/updates/rtl8192su.ko

and not under 

/lib/modules/3.17.1-202.fc20.x86_64/kernel/drivers/......

Seems to suggest this was added from a non-standard source. 

So, maybe the question jd1008 should be asking is "how did you acquire the driver".


-- 
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.



More information about the users mailing list