is it the future?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:30:17 +0200
Anders Wegge Keller <wegge at wegge.dk> wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:08:14 +0300
> Joonas Sarajärvi <muep at iki.fi> wrote:
> 
> > 2014-09-12 11:06 GMT+03:00 Anders Wegge Keller <wegge at wegge.dk>:
> > >  Do you know of a place where I can find the analysis behind this
> > > assessment, or is it just your personal opinion?
> > 
> > The recent initsystem debate [1] from Debian pretty exhaustively
> > explores the pros and cons of many major init system options. While
> > the needs of Fedora differ slightly, a lot of the discussion applies
> > here, too.
> 
>  I'm asking for a pointer to the numerous rebuttals of falsehoods, and
> carefully considerations, that time and time again are claimed to
> exist. A Debian document, written to whitewash a forced descision is
> not what I'm asking for.

Note that the document was composed by the entire debian tech comittee,
even those that voted against systemd, but ok. 

>  I wan't to know where that documentation Kevin Fenzi likes to trot
> about actually is to be found.

Where did I 'trot about' documentation? 

I'd start with: 

http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths.html

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140912/73ff60ec/attachment.sig>