64bit skype client needed

[jd1008]

On 09/17/2014 02:45 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/17/2014 01:25 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
>>
>> On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
>>>> OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
>>>> skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
>>>> but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if there is a way to extract the spec file
>>>> from it and rebuild it (i.e. relink it) with 64bit libs, by
>>>> editing the spec file, and running rpmbuild ...etc.
>>>>
>>> To make a 64-bit build of the application, you would need to actually
>>> compile the sources with a compiler that targets the 64-bit
>>> instruction set. This requires access to application source code.
>>> Source code to the Skype client is not available.
>>>
>>> My impression is that the skype "x86_64" rpm is still the same 32-bit
>>> application that ships in their 32-bit package.
>>>
>>> Fortunately, an x86-64 Fedora installation can easily run also 32-bit
>>> applications.
>>>
>>> -Joonas
>>
>> I do have the 64bit src rpm for
>> skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.src.rpm
>>
>> But all it does when you try to build it, is just name the binary file
>> as a 64 bit rpm.
>> I am still hoping that a compiler and machine code guru will find a way
>> to change 32 bit code to 64 bit counterpart, and change the linkage
>> directives
>> to link with the 64 bit libs.
>>
>> :) hoping is not a nono :)
>
> Not impossible, but INCREDIBLY labor-intensive and it really wouldn't
> improve anything. To make use of the 64-bit registers, memory maps and
> other features, you really need to let the compiler make its
> optimizations and such. This fixation about not having 32-bit libraries
> is quite silly. If you really need Skype, just suck it up, install the
> required libraries and be done with it.
I really AM trying to avoid the 32 bit libs. I just dont want them on my 
system.
You say that's silly.
I hope it is not your standard policy to call people silly
just because they have certain preferences.

>
> You should be more concerned with having a closed-source, non-peer-
> reviewed binary on your machine. Who knows what data it is mining on
> your system and sending off to M$ and their evil minions. Half of the
> apps I've downloaded for my Android phone never get installed because
> as they install they want access to stuff that has NOTHING to do with
> the app's supposed function (for example, I-Heart-Radio has absolutely
> NO need to look at my address book). They get deleted as soon as they
Yes, I have seen that on just about every android app.
But an open source skype-like client just does not exist
with sufficient backing from it's users to afford the phone
lines through which to make phone calls to phone numbers.
Although, even without phone lines for phone numbers,
it would still be very useful for calling contacts who are online.
I recall someone had such a server, but could not afford to get
a high speed internet line to support more than a few callers
at a time.