current/proposed docker-related packages?

[Lokesh Mandvekar]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 08:30:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/17/2015 08:06 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >
> > On 08/16/2015 05:04 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have a related question about Fedora docker packages.  There seems
> >>> to be a docker-engine at version 1.8.1 and docker at version 1.7.1.
> >>> I'd like to have docker AND docker engine at the same version,
> >>> preferably at 1.8.1.  I don't mind having to get docker-compose and
> >>> docker-machine via the docker website directly, but it would also be
> >>> nice to get them via the normal Fedora repositories.  Even though
> >>> docker-machine appears to be broken for all Linux distributions that
> >>> I've tried when running with a local vm (VirtualBox) rather than a
> >>> cloud (AWS).  docker-swarm is still considered beta, so I could see
> >>> why that might not be provided via a Fedora repository.
> >>   you've summed up my wish list nicely ... i'm just trying to make a
> >> list of where to get all the cool stuff in the docker ecosystem,
> >> either as an official fedora package or, if not, then from docker.com
> >> directly.
> >>
> >>   as i read it (and i'm willing to be corrected), there will be some
> >> package renaming in the near future, either synchronized with when
> >> docker 1.8 gets packaged with fedora, or with f23, or maybe both. i
> >> found this page of docker-related fedora packages:
> >>
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/docker*/
> >>
> >> and i know what *was* docker-io is now docker, and that's going to
> >> become docker-engine, is it not? oddly, that list includes
> >> docker-compose as being approved in f22, but i don't yet see it in
> >> "dnf search", so i can only assume it's coming. same thing with
> >> docker-client? docker-machine? etc, etc.

Really not keen to do yet another name change, and since the main binary in
question is still 'docker', doesn't really hurt to keep the package name
'docker' and also have it provide 'docker-engine'. Should the binary name
itself
change to docker-engine, we'll see... :)

'docker-io' exists only for fedora 21 and prior. fedora 22 and forward, it's
'docker'.

'docker-compose' recently got into fedora thanks to Michael
Hampton, a new contributor. Looks like it hasn't made it
into the stable repos yet. Please enable the testing repo to get it.

There are package review requests open for
'docker-machine' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
and 'docker-swarm' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
which I'm handling, but it would move much faster if we have co-maintainers
for this
if anyone is interested :). New/novice packagers welcome too, just get in
touch with me and I'll see what we can do :)


> >>
> >>   regarding other possible packages, i ran across this page at
> >> docker.com, talking about kitematic:
> >>
> >>   http://docs.docker.com/kitematic/
> >>
> >> which refers to something called the "docker toolbox", but it looks
> >> like all that is windows/mac only:
> >>
> >>   https://www.docker.com/toolbox
> >>
> >> and as d walsh(?) mentioned recently, the improved builder "dock" has
> >> been renamed to "atomic-reactor". like i said, i'm just trying to keep
> >> up.
> >>
> >> rday
> >>
> > docker-1.8.1 (docker-engine) should be out soon.  I believe lokesh is
> > working on packaging up the other docker content for Fedora.
> > I am not a big fan of changing the name of docker to docker-engine at
> > this time. (We just changed it from docker-io to docker, and would
> > probably have to alias it anyways.)
> >
> > Lokesh can you add a provides docker-engine to docker package.
> >
> Looks like docker-1.8.1-1.git9281dc3.fc22 is in updates-testing?
> docker-1.8.1-1.git3c1d7c8.fc23
> <http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=677363> is also
> built and I believe movind along.
> 
> docker-1.9.0-2.gitf8950e0.fc24
> <http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=677354> is in Rawhide.
> 
> 

-- 
Lokesh
Freenode: lsm5
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150817/c80673ac/attachment.sig>