encrypting /home partition post-install
Sam Varshavchik
mrsam at courier-mta.com
Tue Dec 1 01:05:20 UTC 2015
Heinz Diehl writes:
> Automatically introducing complexity into 95% of the users systems just
> because it could
> be useful some day is, quite frankly, embarassing. It makes sense the
> other way 'round: complexity adds to the diffculties when
> having to handle data operations (backup, encryption, transfer,
> recovery..) , which in turn makes data loss more likely.
Precisely.
Such as during the grub -> grub2 transition, when a larger spare chunk of
space was needed, after the MBR, to accomodate the larger bootloader.
Two of my servers did not have sufficient space for grub2. But both of them
were formatted as raw, RAID-1 volumes. This made it possible to use a
combination of resize2fs+fdisk to repartition "in-place", in order to give
more spare room to the MBR.
But if I had to deal with useless LVM interloper, I would've been, pretty
much, up the creek.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20151130/11313ea2/attachment.sig>
More information about the users
mailing list