building rpm: error in shared libraries

[arnaud gaboury]

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
>> I have this error:
>>
>> # dnf install MyPackage.rpm
>> Error: package rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64 requires
>> libR.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>
> What's the output of "dnf install -b -v …" for that?

-----------------------------------------------
# dnf install -b -v rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
cachedir: /var/cache/dnf
Loaded plugins: reposync, needs-restarting, system-upgrade,
playground, download, noroot, Query, protected_packages,
debuginfo-install, generate_completion_cache, builddep, copr,
config-manager
DNF version: 1.1.4
repo: using cache for: fedora
not found deltainfo for: Fedora 23 - x86_64
not found updateinfo for: Fedora 23 - x86_64
repo: using cache for: updates
repo: using cache for: home_jeroenooms_opencpu-1.5
not found deltainfo for: OpenCPU 1.5 (Fedora_22)
not found updateinfo for: OpenCPU 1.5 (Fedora_22)
repo: using cache for: trillian
not found deltainfo for: Trillian
not found updateinfo for: Trillian
fedora: using metadata from Sat Oct 31 18:34:41 2015.
updates: using metadata from Sun Dec  6 19:45:27 2015.
home_jeroenooms_opencpu-1.5: using metadata from Wed Jul  1 14:22:10 2015.
trillian: using metadata from Fri Jan  9 17:17:59 2015.
Last metadata expiration check performed 2:38:10 ago on Mon Dec  7
14:35:28 2015.
--> Starting dependency resolution
--> Finished dependency resolution
Error: package rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64 requires
libR.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> The error message reads a bit as if providers are found but are
> not installable due to hidden errors.
>
>> The cited library is indeed already installed:
>>
>> % ldconfig -p | grep libR.so
>> 807: libR.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so
>>
>> This shared lib is provided by a home made package,
>> R-intel-core-3.2.2. This package is similar to Fedora R-core-3.2.2,
>> but built witn Intel compiler and MKL.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> % dnf provides /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so
>
> This is the wrong command to run for examining dependencies. You need to
> ask for the provider of 'libR.so()(64bit)' not the pathname of libR.so.
>
> Show that your installed "R-intel-core" package is a provider of that:
>
>   rpm -q --whatprovides 'libR.so()(64bit)'

------------------------------------
% rpm -q --whatprovides 'libR.so()(64bit)'
no package provides libR.so()(64bit)
----------------------------------------------------

BINGO

> For repos you can use "dnf", old "repoquery" or "dnf repoquery", too.
>
> You can also compare Requires/Provides manually by querying package
> files using "rpm -qp --provides file.rpm" and "rpm -qp --requires file.rpm".
>
>> R-core-3.2.2-1.fc23.x86_64 : The minimal R components necessary for a
>> functional runtime
>> Repo        : fedora
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I added this line in my .spec file:
>> requires: R-intel-core >= 2.11.1
>
> That would neither fix an unresolvable dependency on 'libR.so()(64bit)',
> if no package in the enabled repos provides that "thing" or if a provider
> cannot be installed.
> --
> users mailing list
> users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx