Impossible to add a remote printer

[poma]

On 03.02.2015 11:07, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 05:55 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 02.02.2015 17:49, poma wrote:
>>> On 02.02.2015 17:36, Tim Waugh wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:32 +0100, poma wrote:
>>>>> can this mechanism be improved in the way when you chose not to want
>>>>> to share the printer that the relevant port is closed?
>>>>
>>>> Is there a sane way of doing that though? I think applications wanting
>>>> to 'reset' ports for a zone would need to know what the default was to
>>>> start with.
>>>>
>>>> Tim.
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>
>>> I really do not understand what should be an obstacle. :)
>>> Just to close the port that is no longer used, the same way that we opened.
>>>
>>
>> Mister Woerner, Popelka care to comment?
>> Perhaps I missed some technicalities related.
>>
>>
> I think it would make sense to be able to see if ipp* was enabled in the 
> initial configuration of a zone. Right now this is not possible.
> 
> We might be able to add interfaces to get initial zone, service etc. 
> configuration settings.
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas
> 

I think I understand, but I also think that I did not understand.
Cogito ergo sum.