swapping the disk, with the operating system, using a clone made with CLONEZILLA

Angelo Moreschini mrangelo.fedora at gmail.com
Thu Jan 22 08:14:30 UTC 2015


thanks for your answers


 I explain better .....

recently I started with Linux and, as a beginner, I made many mistakes that
forced me to reinstall many times, both fedora that all the SW already
installed.

That is the way I decided to “invest some time” with clonezilla in order to
prevent the possibility that these problems occurs again.


 Actually I made a clone with the image of the HD where is installed fedora
and now I am doing some tests in order to know very well how much this
clone is reliable and which are the possibilities that I can use it for
recovering my system ...

I took the image of the all HD (I used a new HD witjh 1 TB capacity).


 I know (for trying it) that with the clone I can perform good recovery
when I use it on the same disk from which the image was taken.
However trying to restore on a different (new and virgin) Hard Disk, the
operation fails.


 When I I restore on a virgin HD the computer (after the grub message to
choose the OS), loads fedora only in recovery mode ....


 Having no experience, I can not be sure that the recovery from a clone can
be made on a new virgin HD .. and this is the reason why I posted this
question .

 I can say that when I connected (on the computer) the virgin HD with the
same cables that was connected the old HD it was detected with
different values:


/dev/sda if the original

/dev/sdc if the HD is the new (the virgin one)


 Could this be, perhaps, be the cause of the problem ... ????



 Now I have two questions:

   -

   It is possible to restore the clone on any (different) HD or it is
   possible restore it only on the one HD from where the image was toke?

    -

   if the restore can be done to any HD, ...how I can manage the change of
   symbol attributed to HD?



On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Rick Stevens <ricks at alldigital.com>
> wrote:
> > We do need more info other than "the clone operation failed". I have
> > cloned a large number of machines using Clonezilla using virgin drives
> > (CentOS, Fedora, Ubuntu, Winblows). Many had the target drives larger
> > than the original. I will say that they all used fdisk-style partition
> > tables, though (no GPT tables).
>
> Yeah and it's a minor problem for the backup GPT to be in the wrong
> location, that alone wouldn't cause boot to fail unless the primary
> GPT were hosed somehow. The primary header points to the LBA of the
> backup header, which would still be valid if you had used something
> like dd or ddrescue. The problem is that if the primary header is
> hosed (missing, totally corrupt or checksum fails), a tool will assume
> the backup is at the end of the drive but won't find it there.
>
> Unless that tool is the kernel. Funny enough, the kernel itself right
> now doesn't fallback to the backup GPT if the primary one is corrupt.
> Instead boot fails. Not cool! [1]
>
>
> [1]
> mishandled corruption of primary GPT table, failure to boot
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63591
>
> --
> Chris Murphy
> --
> users mailing list
> users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150122/b9168aee/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list