unmaintained bugs

[jd1008]

On 07/21/2015 11:09 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:53:12PM +0200, antonio montagnani wrote:
>> for my info, when a bug can be defined orphaned, i.e. which is the
>> grace period not to be sorpassed???
> I don't know what sorpassed means. But....
>
> * When a Fedora release reaches end-of-life, bugs filed against that
> release are automatically closed as "EOL". If you know that bug still
> exists in a supported version, please reopen these and reassign them to
> the current version or to rawhide.
>
> * If a package maintainer appears to be totally unresponsive to bug
> reports, follow the process here:
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
>
It seems like if bugs against rel 1 are still open just before EOL,
and closed thereafter, AND, these bugs are no longer in rel 2,
does release 2 have any document stating that the bugs was fixed?
How can a user trace that fix and then try to back-port it?

I suspect that the bug is never fixed even in rel 2, nor do the lease
notes make any mention of the fix re: the automatically ignored bugs
from the previous rel.