Update 20 -> 22, failure

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:20:13 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:

> > > xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.2.0-3.20131101git3b38701.fc20.i686
> > > xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-13.0.0-6.fc20.i686
> > > xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.7.7-2.fc20.i686
> > > xorg-x11-drv-fbdev-0.4.3-10.fc20.i686
> > >
> > > None of them has been updated!!
> > 
> > Didn't you say you upgraded from F20 to F22? How did you do that?
> 
> YES

_HOW_ exactly? With a tool like fedup?

> > On Run-level 3:
> > 
> >   dnf update
> Dependencies resolved.
> Nothing to do.
> Complete!

Have you had a look at "rpm -qa --last" yet? What does it tell?
You can redirect the output to a file or a pipe, such as

  rpm -qa --last > output.txt
  rpm -qa --last|less

and show it.

> > or:
> >   dnf distro-sync
> Last metadata expiration check performed 1:03:22 ago on Wed Jul 29 11:16:10 2015.
> Error: package directfb-1.6.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libmng.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed.
> package pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.i686 requires itext(x86-32) >= 2.1.7-6, but none of the providers can be installed

directfb has been retired after Fedora 19:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/directfb.git/plain/dead.package

pdftk has been retired after Fedora 19, too:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pdftk.git/plain/dead.package

It seems you haven't cleaned up your installation for a very long time.
There have been tools to do that. Even "yum list extras" has been popular.
"dnf list extras" also exists.

> > Also verify "dnf repolist" and /etc/fedora-release so that you're
> > really using Fedora 22 repos.

Did you ignore this step deliberately?