Update 20 -> 22, failure

[Patrick Dupre]

Hello,

I wish to thank Michael for his help and patience in understanding the issue.
It was a bit stressing, but finally done.

It seems to indicate that the upgrade from 20 to 22 may not be 
without risk.
My understanding is that the dependency failures which where more or less acceptable
with yum update, now prevent the update with dnf. The key point is
that there is not real complain or straight aware.

Thank again every body.

===========================================================================
 Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdupre at gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale           | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12                   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann                 | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================


> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 2:06 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt" <mschwendt at gmail.com>
> To: users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:55:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> 
> > > Is it the same when you run "dnf distro-sync"?
> > Error: package directfb-1.6.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libmng.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed.
> > package pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.i686 requires itext(x86-32) >= 2.1.7-6, but none of the providers can be installed
> > 
> 
> I told you before that these do not exist anymore and have been
> retired _after_ Fedora 19. You *cannot* keep them if they cause dep breakage:
> 
>   dnf remove directfb pdftk
>   dnf distro-sync
> 
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerpro-common-192-13.1-5.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerpro-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerpro-vars-192-13.1-5.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerproc-192-13.1-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerproc-common-192-13.1-5.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerproc-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerprof-192-13.1-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerprof-common-192-13.1-5.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-compilerprof-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-idb-192-13.0-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-idb-common-192-13.0-5.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-idbcdt-192-13.0-5.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-ipp-192-7.1-1.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-ipp-common-192-7.1-1.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-ipp-devel-192-7.1-1.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-mkl-192-11.0-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-mkl-common-192-11.0-5.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-mkl-devel-192-11.0-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-openmp-192-13.1-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-openmp-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-sourcechecker-common-192-13.1-5.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-sourcechecker-devel-192-13.1-5.i486
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-tbb-192-4.1-4.noarch
> > nothing provides lsb >= 3.0 needed by intel-tbb-devel-192-4.1-4.noarch
> 
> These are not from Fedora, are they?
> You may need to deal with them, too, as long as they cause dependency
> problems.
> 
> > >   dnf repoquery --duplicated 
> > 
> > kernel-PAE-0:3.19.8-100.fc20.i686
> > kernel-PAE-0:4.0.4-301.fc22.i686
> > kernel-PAE-devel-0:3.19.8-100.fc20.i686
> > kernel-PAE-devel-0:4.0.4-301.fc22.i686
> > kernel-PAE-devel-0:4.0.8-300.fc22.i686
> > kernel-PAE-devel-0:4.1.2-200.fc22.i686
> > kernel-PAE-modules-extra-0:3.19.8-100.fc20.i686
> > kernel-PAE-modules-extra-0:4.0.4-301.fc22.i686
> 
> Well, okay for now, cleaning up wouldn't hurt but normally three kernels are kept
> automatically only anyway.
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>