Crashes of tainted kernels

[Chris Murphy]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:11 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/16/2015 01:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:44 AM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since none of the crashes occur in the modules
>>> inserted via akmods, why is the fedora abrt not
>>> allowing thes ending of such reports?
>>
>> I think this question needs to go to the Fedora devel@ list, or maybe
>> also kernel@ as a cross-post (explicitly mentioned from the outset
>> it's a crosspost).
>>
>> Just because the crash doesn't occur in an out of tree module, doesn't
>> mean that the out of tree module isn't instigating the problem though.
>>
>>
>> Chris Murphy
>
> Chris,
> It does not mean many things.
> That is not such a good criterion for abrt to reject
> the submission of the crash.

I think it's a good criterion. You don't. Others have stated practical
technical reasons they shouldn't go in the reporting system, and you
just discard them out of hand. You want what you want because you want
it is perhaps understandable, but it's not going to change minds or
win arguments.


-- 
Chris Murphy