DNF upgrade rc1 -

Ed Greshko ed.greshko at greshko.com
Fri Nov 13 09:28:09 UTC 2015



On 11/13/15 16:19, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> I noticed this yesterday and have been excluding these:
>
>> [root at Box10 bobg]# dnf upgrade
>> Last metadata expiration check performed 0:23:34 ago on Fri Nov 13 02:28:50 2015.
>> Dependencies resolved.
>> ========================================================================================================================================================
>>
>>  Package Arch Version Repository                   Size
>> ========================================================================================================================================================
>>
>> Upgrading:
>>  rpm x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates                     509 k
>>  rpm-build-libs x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates                     115 k
>>  rpm-libs x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates                     293 k
>>  rpm-plugin-selinux x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates                      50 k
>>  rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates                      50 k
>>  rpm-python x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates                      99 k
>>  rpm-python3 x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates                     100 k
>>
>> Transaction Summary
>> ========================================================================================================================================================
>>
>> Upgrade  7 Packages
>>
>> Total download size: 1.2 M
>> Is this ok [y/N]: n
>> Operation aborted.
>
> I've gone through /etc/yum.repos.d/ and have testing and rawhide set to enabled=0 in
> each of the following:
>
> [root at Box10 bobg]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/
> total 48
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root  183 Apr  1  2011 adobe-linux-x86_64.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1255 Oct 19 23:41 fedora.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1270 Oct 19 23:41 fedora-updates.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1328 Oct 19 23:41 fedora-updates-testing.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1241 Oct 24 11:38 rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1172 Oct 24 11:38 rpmfusion-free.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1170 Oct 24 11:43 rpmfusion-free-updates.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1230 Nov 12 03:57 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1295 May  1  2015 rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1217 May  1  2015 rpmfusion-nonfree.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1215 Oct 24 16:09 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1275 Nov 13 02:40 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo
>
>
> However it continues to want to update a few with the rc1 rpm's which seems inadvisable ...
>
> What am I missing?

Nothing....  Those "rc1" packages are the most recent builds.



-- 
In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should stay away from
computers altogether.


More information about the users mailing list