PCI-e SSD recommendation for a F22 machine

Mihamina Rakotomandimby mihamina.rakotomandimby at rktmb.org
Fri Sep 4 15:18:03 UTC 2015



On 09/04/2015 05:58 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>> If I take the traditional computing scheme, such as compiling the Linux
>> kernel, much of the need is to also have fast storage in the code source
>> tree.
>>
>> Depending on what compiler you use and what option you give it, the I/O
>> generated by object files (just an example) would kill your performances.
> Good point. Perhaps, one way to get around this is to also move executables and libraries generated by me to the "System" side of things, using perhaps a make install.
>
> I used gcc with -O3 or -Ofast. Any suggestions on this?

Not being a specialist, I would say that the safer is the best option. 
Optimisation flags comes with drawbacks on some codebase.
There was a time, a long time ago, when I compiled the kernel, -O2 and 
-O3 lead me to different misbehaviour.
Being "old" now, I dont compile my kernel anymore ;-)

>> My suggestion would be to leave the system on the "slow disk", as you
>> boot one time, and put the source tree either in "tmpfs" or SSD.
> Any suggestions of a specific PCI-e SSD. I would prefer 128 GB or something not larger than that.
>

I know OVH really liked Intel brand, and they provide dedicated servers 
where you can choose many OSes.
That's just what I know.

But I'm certain your feedback would be interesting.

At least, buy your in a store where you have choice *and* where you can 
replace it if ever fails to run with your OS.
Could be more expensive, but...




More information about the users mailing list