Can't kill a umount

[Cameron Simpson]

On 06Sep2015 16:42, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 09/06/2015 01:35 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>I'm actually astounded that unout will spin out unless in-kernel 
>>work is being counted to the CPU time (not normally the case). Yes, 
>>the drive appears to be buggy, but that should be concealed inside 
>>the kernel.
>
>User CPU time and system CPU time are accounted separately, but top will normally show the sum of the two.

Ok. But will it also show the process in "R" state? I've have thought not.

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au>