mpg123 not included, why?

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 19:18 +0100, Philip Brown wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 06:21 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 10:41 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko at greshko.co
> > > m>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > mpg123 is available from the rpmfusion repos.
> > > 
> > > Thanks Ed!
> > > 
> > > Is there any side-effect from enabling the rpmfusion repos?
> > > Conflict with system libs?
> > No, stuff in RPMfusion is there because of license issues, but I've
> > never had a problem with it. I suspect most people on the list have
> > it
> > enabled.
> > 
> > poc
> 
> if you don't want to install all the extra software repos etc... you
> can 
> just grab the rpms from rpmfusion, unzip and get all the .so files
> out 
> of them and place them in your .local/share/gstreamer-1.0/plugins 
> folder. a la:
> 
> ls .local/share/gstreamer-1.0/plugins/
> libgsta52dec.so    libgstcdio.so        libgstlame.so
> libgstrmdemux.so
> libgstamrnb.so     libgstdvdlpcmdec.so  libgstlibav.so
> libgsttwolame.so
> libgstamrwbdec.so  libgstdvdread.so     libgstmad.so libgstx264.so
> libgstasf.so       libgstdvdsub.so      libgstmpeg2dec.so
> libgstxingmux.so
> 
> and most all codecs will now run in your gnome applications without
> any worries.

That means you get to check back periodically and repeat the process by
hand if they've been updated. I don't see why most people would do
that. There really isn't a problem enabling RPMfusion repos. They are
designed to be used with the standard Fedora repos so you aren't going
to magically install stuff that conflicts.

poc