mpg123 not included, why?

[Philip Brown]

On 01/09/2016 08:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 19:18 +0100, Philip Brown wrote:
>> On 01/09/2016 06:21 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 10:41 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko at greshko.co
>>>> m>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> mpg123 is available from the rpmfusion repos.
>>>> Thanks Ed!
>>>>
>>>> Is there any side-effect from enabling the rpmfusion repos?
>>>> Conflict with system libs?
>>> No, stuff in RPMfusion is there because of license issues, but I've
>>> never had a problem with it. I suspect most people on the list have
>>> it
>>> enabled.
>>>
>>> poc
>> if you don't want to install all the extra software repos etc... you
>> can
>> just grab the rpms from rpmfusion, unzip and get all the .so files
>> out
>> of them and place them in your .local/share/gstreamer-1.0/plugins
>> folder. a la:
>>
>> ls .local/share/gstreamer-1.0/plugins/
>> libgsta52dec.so    libgstcdio.so        libgstlame.so
>> libgstrmdemux.so
>> libgstamrnb.so     libgstdvdlpcmdec.so  libgstlibav.so
>> libgsttwolame.so
>> libgstamrwbdec.so  libgstdvdread.so     libgstmad.so libgstx264.so
>> libgstasf.so       libgstdvdsub.so      libgstmpeg2dec.so
>> libgstxingmux.so
>>
>> and most all codecs will now run in your gnome applications without
>> any worries.
> That means you get to check back periodically and repeat the process by
> hand if they've been updated. I don't see why most people would do
> that. There really isn't a problem enabling RPMfusion repos. They are
> designed to be used with the standard Fedora repos so you aren't going
> to magically install stuff that conflicts.
>
> poc
yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

--