[fedora-virt] F19: replacing chardev patches with upstream ones

Cole Robinson crobinso at redhat.com
Tue Apr 23 14:32:56 UTC 2013


On 04/23/2013 01:57 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Fedora has carried flow control patches for qemu chardevs since a very
> long time now.  They weren't upstream, and they were required for
> spice, usb-redir to work properly and not freeze the guest.
> 
> Upstream qemu has now merged an alternative implementation of the same
> concept, and most of the bugs have been shaken out upstream (we don't
> know of any known bugs now).  So I'm of the view we should replace
> the older patches in F19's qemu with the backport of the newer,
> upstream ones.
> 
> Is this fine?  I can work with Cole / Hans who have been keeping the
> older patches uptodate on Fedora to replace the patches.
> 

If the backport is fairly clean and self contained it should be okay, but
can't say I'm excited about it. What's the benefit besides more testing of the
new code? Yes we get to drop the old patches but at this point they are a long
tested known quantity. If it was a month ago I'd be less resistant but this
will be past the alpha.

I'll leave it to your discretion but if the backport is pulling in unrelated
patches so things apply cleanly, or needs non-trivial alteration to work on
1.4, we should re-evaluate.

Thanks,
Cole


More information about the virt mailing list