Archive fedora-websites-list

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 00:50 -0600, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007, Thomas Chung wrote:
> > On 2/23/07, Patrick W. Barnes <nman64 at n-man.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm referring to posts like
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/2007-February/msg00001
> >.html Do we really need to post this type of messages to our archive?
> 
> From among posted messages, we cannot filter what hits the archives and what 
> does not, so the real question becomes "do we need the CVS messages posted to 
> the list?"  In long-past discussions, the answer has been "yes."  If you feel 
> the time has come to review the issue, let's hear your thoughts.

I'm assuming the problem is the bulky and unattractive headers caused by
CVS commits?

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
      Fedora Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/attachments/20070224/93fd2184/attachment.sig>