Gremlins! - "Join Fedora" captcha is Unreadable
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Thu Oct 15 01:06:30 UTC 2009
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:01:41AM -0600, Clint Savage wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not actually sure, here's the app we're using:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/tgcaptcha/
> >
> > It's a pretty easy change to start using Vanasco-Dowty but it gets tricky.
> > neither one is particularly easy to read (which I guess is the point)
> >
> > -Mike
>
> Actually the Vanasco-Dowty is *much* easier to read (from what I see
> on their google code page). I can read the McDermott CAPTCHA, but it
> takes my eyes more effort and I had to squint a little. This is just
> my experience, but I think the Vanasco-Dowty would be a good
> compromise.
>
Bodhi switched from Vanasco-Dowty to McDermott because Vanasco-Dowty was too
hard for people to use. I remember playing with it and I think the issue
was that Vanasco-Dowty is much harder to figure out uppercase and lowercase
than McDermott. Note that that's not something you realize by reading the
documentation -- that's only something you realize by having your captcha
rejected because you typed "CIKLOPSUVWXZ" instead of "ciklopsuvwxz".
I'd love to see someone create a new captcha algorithm that was easier to
use. I'd work on it myself but I don't know what a computer can or cannot
read.
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/attachments/20091014/7ca341e8/attachment.sig>
More information about the websites
mailing list