[PATCH] fp.o: Include previous stable release on /verify

[Todd Zullinger]

Hi Máirín,

Máirín Duffy wrote:
> I think folks primarily identify with first the version of Fedora they
> use, then the install method. So I think it might be better to split
> these up by version as the top-level category, e.g.:
>
> Fedora 13 (released May xx)
>
> Live Media
> foo
> bar
> baz
> qux
>
> Install DVD / Rescue CD
> foo
> bar
> baz
>
> Fedora 12 (released Nov xx)
>
> Live Media
> foo
> bar
> baz
>
> Install DVD / Rescue CD
> foo
> bar
> baz

That's a fine point.  I played a little with that when I did it, but
don't have your keen sense of design.  So your comments are
appreciated.  Any thoughts on whether it's worth doing these
side-by-side or is it cleaner to run them vertically?  (I worried
about making the page too long originally, that's why I went with the
sid-by-side layout.)

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's not denial. I'm just very selective about what I accept as
reality.
    -- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/attachments/20100803/ae38fa82/attachment.sig>