Possible bug

[Jose Manimala]

Yeah, you are right. From what I can tell the feeds are only loaded when
Planet detects an update and must be checking a cached version to compare
for stale posts.

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Sijis Aviles <sijis at fedoraproject.org>wrote:

> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Jose Manimala <josemanimala at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Fedora Planet is a Feed aggregator. So the date must be reflecting from
> the
> > blogs feed. Please see the attachment
> >
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Ian MacGregor <ardchoille42 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I am reading Planet Fedora and noticed the top post has a date of May
> >> 23, 2010
> >>
> >> http://planet.fedoraproject.org/
> >>
> >> Is this a bug? I am UTC -7 and it's only May 19, 2010 here.
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Ian MacGregor
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ardchoille42
> >>
> >> --
> >> websites mailing list
> >> websites at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kind Regards
> > Jose M Manimala
> > http://josemanimala.eu.org
> > Ph: +64221033100
> > GPGkeyID: 1BE49F39
> >
> Jose,
>
> Yeah, i think you are right. Planet is basically just pulling the date
> the feed sent to it.
> I'm just curious to know if that post will stay up top till the 24th
> or move down with the refresh. (I will speculate it will move down).
>
> Sijis
>



-- 
Kind Regards
Jose M Manimala
http://josemanimala.eu.org
Ph: +64221033100
GPGkeyID: 1BE49F39
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/attachments/20100520/cc9d2bbb/attachment.html>