More proposed get.fpo adjustments, based on user feedback

[Ricky Zhou]

On 2010-05-27 08:47:28 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:44:02AM -0500, Sijis Aviles wrote:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Sijis Aviles <sijis.aviles at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm all for this. I think the changes are great.
> > > +1
> > >
> > > A quick thought about that architecture tab would be replacing it with an advanced tab, which would include the stuff in get-fedora-all. We can discuss this further.
> > >
> > > One question - what would we do about the older releases?
> > >
> > > Sijis
> > >
> > 
> > I just looked at the patch and it answers the older release question.
> > 
> > The one thing i did notice was there were a few links to
> > "http://localhost:5000/get-fedora-all". Those should probably be
> > changed to "${lang}/get-fedora-all".
> 
> Don't we use "./get-fedora-all"?  That should land in the correct
> language for everyohne.
We usually use paths relative to /, so the correct convention would be:

${path}/${lang}/get-fedora-all

We should probably do a check of the current site to make sure we are
consistent with this.

Thanks,
Ricky
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/attachments/20100527/4a962345/attachment.sig>