Feedback from Distrowatch

[Danishka Navin]

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 08:08 -0300, Davi Garcia wrote:
> >> > Just a little reminder, Fedora was around BEFORE Facebook. If there is
> >> > anyone who should change their logo, it's Facebook, not us.
> >>
> >> I definitely agree with that.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I see no reason at all to change our logo. It's perfect the way it is.
>
> If it is confused with other logos from a similar product space then
> it isn't perfect. It may well be no fault of the logo but it is a
> problem.
>
> > If someone thought it was a Facebook plug-in.. well...
>
> If a lot of someones think it is related to Facebook then it is a
> problem worth thinking about before it gets completely out of control.
> We have seen other hints that this confusion exists in the past as
> well.
>
> Admitting we have a brand problem which seems to be related to some
> similar aspects that exist in our logo and in Facebook's logo doesn't
> mean we need to abandon our logo. Are there other ways available to us
> to mitigate this confusion? Perhaps advertising Fedora more widely so
> more people are exposed to our brand more often? Perhaps something
> else?
>


it would be great if we could identify the region/location of those people.
but there is no such information i guess.

I think we should increase our presence in the social media specially in
Facebook itself.


>
> John
> --
> websites mailing list
> websites at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
>



-- 
Danishka Navin
http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/danishkanavin
http://www.flickr.com/photos/danishkanavin/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/attachments/20120509/52fcd078/attachment.html>