Terminal desktop file name

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:44:39 +0200
Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Am Dienstag, den 21.06.2011, 08:32 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: 
> > Greetings. 
> > 
> > What do folks think about: 
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714835
> > 
> > I'm ok with just changing/adding to the desktop name here for
> > clarity... 
> > 
> > what do others think?
> 
> -1.
> 
> What is so bad in having a "Terminal" on each desktop? For things like
> terminals, file managers, calculators or address books we should IHMO
> use "OnlyShowIn" and only show them in their native environment.

Because if you have several installed, they ALL show up as 'Terminal'
in the menu and you have no idea which one you are picking? 

I think there are legit reasons to have several installed. Perhaps you
use Xfce, but prefer gnome-terminal, or you want them both installed in
case one has a bug that prevents you from doing work?

Sounds like upstream might just rename Terminal to xfce4-terminal and
be done with it. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20110621/502c6a2d/attachment.bin