Standby and suspend buttons greyed out

Raphael Groner raphgro at web.de
Sun Dec 9 11:09:20 UTC 2012


Am Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:09:54 +0000
schrieb xfce-request at lists.fedoraproject.org:

> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 13:52:27 -0700
> From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com>
> To: xfce at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Standby and suspend buttons greyed out
> Message-ID: <20121208135227.1993073f at jelerak.scrye.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:30:28 +0100 (CET)
> "Raphael Groner" <raphgro at web.de> wrote:
{…}

> I'm not sure what you are asking here... can you rephrase?
> 
> We cannot directly modify the defaults in logind.conf... that would be
> something for the end user. Our choices are to add a inhibit to
> session (which I don't like), or get xfce4-power-manager to handle
> inhibiting (which I think is the correct solution). 
> 
> kevin

Yeah, I just wanted to sum up what's the possible solution so far for
the end user. But you can do it obviously much shorter. :)

I don't understand how the session is related to that issue in any
case

xfce4-power-manager uses a dbus interface to instruct the power
management component. Is upower already merged to systemd, will it be
in some future version (any plans to do that)?

KDE (and GNOME) have similiar issues. The main bug seems to be.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859227

- and then for GNOME in particular:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859224

I tend to give up on that hibernate/suspend/sleep well/simulate death
thingy when reading through all those comments. WTF external monitors
need special handling? Cause it gets more and more complex. Yeah, it
should be routed to the end user that can configure it fully like she
wants. SCNR to do some trolling here.

Raphael


More information about the xfce mailing list