Is xfce4-power-manager unmaintained?

[Raphael Groner]

That was a joke with yacpi, please don't take my kidding seriously. 

Sorry for the noise. :)

But xfpm needs really love. Maybe I have to rewrite sth. from scratch.

Best,
~R.


Am Tue, 13 May 2014 12:00:04 +0000
schrieb xfce-request at lists.fedoraproject.org:

> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 21:12:47 +0200
> From: Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es>
> To: Raphael Groner <projects.rg at smart.ms>
> Cc: xfce at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Is xfce4-power-manager unmaintained?
> Message-ID: <20140511191247.GD10909 at killefiz>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:31:10PM +0200, Raphael Groner wrote:
> 
> > since xfce4-power-manager seems to need some love from upstream
> > since some months, the xfce maintainers in Fedora as well, and it
> > seems to lack a persistent maintainer, I suggest to replace it in
> > favor of yacpi, at least on the xfce spin media. Though, it's based
> > on ncrus What do you think?  
> 
> 1st: the last yacpi release was 7 years ago
> 2nd: the it doesn't manage anything - it just displays the current
> acpi cpu state and battery capacity. I don't use XFCE but judging
> from the name I'd guess that xfce4-power-manager does more than that.
> 
> So I guess that the replacement is a bad idea.