On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:23:33PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I'm of a mind to urge that cups be considered a system
library (as it's
> upstream also argues)
Possibly this is something we could formally define with Modularity.
(That is, all libraries in Platform & Host are "system libraries")?
Leaving aside "applications" for now -- What about the case where one of
those "system libraries" (say, GTK+) directly depends on another "system
library" (say, libcups) which now sports an incompatible license?
Because that's the problem we're actually facing here...
- Solomon
--
Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org
Coconut Creek, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.