On 11/20/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 12:01 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
>
>> The git tree is currently a read-only (slave) version of the CVS
>> tree, and I expect it to stay that way for some time. But even though
>> Fedora isn't switching VCSes at this point, I think it would still
>> make sense to have git/hg/random-other-VCS conversions of the Fedora
>> CVS tree publically available ...
>
> +1 to the general idea.
>
> Are you interested in building and maintaining the solution in Fedora
> Infrastructure? Just asking as a bystander ... :)
What problem are we trying to solve by doing this
I see it as a POC for a future VCS alternative. Now that Koji is
getting some support for building from a VCS other than CVS I we are
getting to the point where people can actually try something other
than CVS for maintaining packages, rather than just talk about it.
or what added
functionality will we get that people can't get by just downloading a
snapshot and importing it into git themselves?
The structure and the size of the package CVS makes it difficult for
someone to casually make their own git mirror.
Jeff